So, let me get this straight. A guy
walks into a bank and asks for a loan (sounds like the start of a joke, doesn't it? Unfortunately, it isn't). The banker sits him down and goes thro’
the requirements for the loan. The guy
agrees to furnish all documents needed at which point, the banker does the
first of many checks – Credit worthiness (Is the person able to repay the
amount and, if not, does he have enough collateral to cover the loan). Once these checks have been passed, the bank
issues a check to cover the loan. It is expected that the person will make
payments every month to cover the principle and the (outrageous?)
interest. This is what happens to you
and I, the common people. We then make
these payments for the next 10-20 years and get to own whatever it is we needed
the loan for. We sweat blood every day in order to keep our end of the bargain,
except...
The
banks don’t have any such checks, especially where banking is
nationalized. Back in the late 80’s and
early 90’s, here in the US of A, we had a similar occurrence (The Savings and
Loans scandal). Many retirees and seniors had their money in banks, as most
people would. Some of the retirees had
invested in, the now infamous, Savings
and Loans Assocations (akin to the Chit Funds in India). These S&L
institutions lent money to people who needed to buy a house, a car, a boat (use
your imagination). When over a thousand
S&L institutions declared insolvency, the estimated loss was over 250
Billion USD. It is reported that many seniors, who lost their life savings,
died due to this while others were left penniless. What did the government do? Not much.
We have
come to expect many state governments, in India, to dole out money, sometimes low interest and
most times no interest, to the farmers and other underprivileged
communities. Where do they get the money
from? The money comes from our hard earned deposits and taxes. Most people keep their money in the banks
which then invest in the stocks (risky as it is, it is the only way they can
get a return on these large deposits). We
also pay our taxes which are then filtered down to the states. The taxes are meant to be used for the
benefit of the public at large; not a particular community. The return on our
deposits, are meant for our personal gain; again, not the public at large. But,
how does one monitor who rightfully gets the money? This, my dear reader, is
where it gets tricky. In India, the
Reserve Bank of India is the appointed institution to monitor any mismanagement
of funds. When the RBI is allegedly involved in these scams, who monitors the
monitor?
Politicians,
regardless of whether they’re in the USA or India, will try to gain political
advantage by assisting some selected people with their “political aashirwad.”
When a politician holds that much power in his/her hands, more often than not, it
goes to his/her head. The expectation is, not just a vote but, financial
benefits (Some would say, benefits for both). Benefitting can only happen when
the loan amounts are outrageous, like the 11,000 Crores loaned to Nirav Modi.
The kick-backs will go further up than just a minister; probably all the way up
to the top. I was told, by a friend who
is HIGH UP in the Indian financial food chain, that this scandal is just the tip of
the iceberg. According to him, between
2005 and 2014, many such loans were approved and these would come out to the
open. This brings up my question: Is
Brutus an honorable man? We have been
told that PC and his ilk are involved, but who else was involved in this
massive cover-up? Was MMS involved? Will
we ever know?
Comments
Post a Comment