Skip to main content

Nationalism- A Negative?

When Priyanka Chopra uttered those infamous lines in her TV show, “this is a rudraksh..they are Hindu nationalists”, that one statement was enough to equate nationalists to terror! The influence the media has on on people is absolute! All of a sudden, people like Bhagat Singh, Chandrasekhar Azad and others became antisocial elements who wanted the downfall of a legitimate government!

When does one say “enough bullshit”? Since when did Nationalism became a negative to be abhorred? While we appreciate the media for its positive unifying reporting (9/11 comes to mind), we also have to fault them for many an incident that should never have been reported erroneously (Godhra comes to mind). To single one community for being fervent patriots is ridiculous but it happened! To then blame the Hindus for being the reason for all ills while the peaceful community is being targeted by the Hindus shows the levels to which the media will stoop to get ratings.

Ms Chopra may, or may not, be an active participant in the scripting of the show but she didn’t do herself, and the Hindus, any favors by just blindly repeating the words above. For this, people will now boycott her movies. No she’ll not be poor (she’s made millions) but at least it will give the wannabes fodder to think on. When is enough enough?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Appeasement policies and the negative effects

While the policies geared towards minority appeasement thrive, let’s look at some of the effects these have had on India: 1. It has taken the Bharat out of India. It was once a thriving society that brought humanity to the world. It was Bharat. Today, we call it India. It doesn’t reflect the proud lineage that we have but, on the contrary, reflects what we have become after all the subjugation under the Moghuls and then the British. Our ancestors lived fearlessly in a society that believed in Equality For All; we live in fear! Fear that what we have today may not be there tomorrow, forgetting that the ultimate truth can not be avoided by anyone. 2. The once proud jewel of the east had so much to offer, apart from its riches. The knowledge that our ancestors had and imparted to their disciples is now recorded as mythology. Our kids are ready to believe that when Jesus walked, the sea parted; but ask how Lord Vishnu could really come down to earth in so many forms? The only one to bla...

My Response to Sitram Yechury & Other Commies

My Response To Those Who Think Hinduism Is A Violent Religion Dear Reader, I don’t know about you but my feathers were ruffled when I read comments on Hindus, more specifically about Ramayana and Mahabharat.  This irked me to the point where I decided to challenge this mindset;    those that do believe this notion should prove to me the epics are an indication of a violent society.  These bourgeois left leaning “intellectuals” have obviously not read nor understood the two epics. This is my letter them.  Please let me know if you need any new additions to this letter. Dear bourgeois Intellectual, please buy the videos by Ramanand Sagar and Yash Chopra. Firstly, you’ll see,    that The Ramayana is a book about ridding the world of dushkarmis, people that propogate violence.  That you’d target this book tells me that you’ve not read one word of this book, so let me explain in words you probably understand.  Think of the Ramayana as...

People Just Don’t Care

What is it that prevents the common Indian person to stay away from the polling booths. Not all of them, mind you. For the most part, people understand their responsibility and come out to vote. Then we have a group of “elitists” who don’t seem to think they need to grace the polling booth, for whatever flimsy reason they can concoct. It’s not like they haven’t seen lines of people waiting patiently, and yet a line of people waiting to vote seems to be a formidable force that they get maimed by! Is this what a true democracy looks like? Even in the USA, we have scragglers who don’t show up to vote but that’s a very minute part of the population. When a city , the size of Bangalore, shows only 50% of its population votes, this does show a systemic problem. I would venture a guess that the city is inhabited by a transient population that is unable to connect with the local representative. However, ideologies should dictate the vote not the person. A good person belonging to a corrupt p...